Key Points:
- Havering Council Deputy Leader, Councillor Gillian Ford, responds to controversy over the potential removal of prayers and the national anthem at full council meetings.
- Councillor Ford criticises the sensationalism around the issue, calling out a Romford Councillor for spreading misinformation.
- The cross-party Governance meeting discussed the format of full council meetings, including time for debate and the inclusion of prayers and the national anthem.
- Councillor Ford reassures residents that no formal proposals have been made to change the traditions, and the discussion was merely informal.
- The Constitution Working Group will present ideas for improving meeting efficiency, but no rash decisions will be made.
- Ford emphasises that the Havering Residents Association (HRA) listens to its residents and values their traditions.
The debate over the inclusion of prayers and the national anthem at the start of Havering‘s full council meetings has stirred significant public attention. Councillor Gillian Ford, the Deputy Leader of Havering Council, has responded to the growing concerns, strongly rebuffing claims that the council is seriously considering scrapping these traditional practices.
What did Councillor Gillian Ford say about the ongoing discussions?
In her statement, Councillor Ford criticised a Romford Councillor for stirring up a baseless story that has led to public confusion. She made it clear that this matter had arisen from an informal discussion at a cross-party Governance meeting. The meeting, which took place recently, had no concrete proposals or decisions. Instead, it was a discussion about reviewing the overall structure of council meetings to allow more time for debate.
What is the role of the Cross-Party Constitution Working Group in this matter?
The Cross-Party Constitution Working Group has been tasked with coming up with ideas to improve the efficiency of council meetings. Councillor Ford explained that the group has not yet met to discuss the details of the format, which could include aspects such as question time, motions, meeting start and finish times, and the overall order of the meeting. At this stage, the working group is focusing on ensuring that there is sufficient time for important discussions, but nothing has been decided regarding the future of the national anthem or prayers.
Has any formal proposal been made to remove the national anthem and prayers from the meetings?
No formal proposal has been put forward to remove the national anthem or prayers, Ford assured the public. She emphasised that these discussions were informal and centred around improving the format of council meetings. Councillor Ford was adamant that such traditions are valued by many residents, and any decisions regarding them would be made with great care and consideration.
Why does Councillor Ford believe this issue has been blown out of proportion?
Councillor Ford expressed disappointment that what she described as informal discussions about council procedures had been sensationalised by the media. According to Ford, these discussions were part of a broader review process aimed at making meetings more effective and allowing more time for debate. She raised concerns about the media’s tendency to distort the intentions of elected officials, especially when the focus should be on more pressing issues facing the community, such as rising crime and local economic challenges.
What stance has the HRA taken on this matter?
Ford stressed that the Havering Residents Association (HRA) does not make rash decisions. The association is committed to listening to residents and ensuring that their traditions and values are upheld. She stated that there are no proposals to change the way council meetings are conducted, and the traditions of starting with prayers and the national anthem remain a point of respect for many.
What impact has this debate had on residents and local politics?
The debate has sparked mixed reactions among residents, many of whom have expressed frustration over the fact that such a long-standing tradition is even being questioned. For others, the issue has raised concerns about the priorities of the council, with some feeling that more urgent matters should take precedence. Councillor Ford’s comments reflect the concerns of many residents who believe that changes to these traditions should not be made without widespread consultation and careful consideration.
