Key Points
- Serious cycling injuries in Hackney rose from 42 in 2024 to 71 in 2025, including one fatality
- Overall cyclists killed or seriously injured (KSIs) in London jumped 20.3% from 994 in 2024 to 1,196 in 2025 — a record high since at least 2017
- Westminster saw KSIs increase from 80 to 101; Lambeth from 70 to 85; Newham from 14 to 36; Hounslow from 26 to 45
- City of London KSIs rose from 22 to 35; Camden from 34 to 44; Lewisham from 34 to 44; Bromley from 9 to 21
- Total cycling casualties (including slight injuries) reached 5,662 in 2025, up 16.1% from 4,878 in 2024 — also a record high
- Daily cycle journeys grew 12.7% from 1.33 million (2024) to 1.5 million (2025), yet injury rates rose faster than journey growth
- Transport for London highlighted the drop in cycling fatalities (9 to 6) but did not emphasise the 20% rise in KSIs, sparking a “cover-up” accusation
- Transport campaigner John Stewart said: “The latest data suggests it’s becoming more dangerous to cycle on London’s streets” and accused TfL of trying to “cover up these shocking figures”
- Simon Munk of London Cycling Campaign stated: “The current level of risk is on the rise and there are more serious injuries than there was growth in cycling. That’s absolutely the wrong direction”
- Road safety activist Vincent Stops warned: “By failing to point this out, they (TfL) are not being honest and sufficiently open and so policy making will be poor”
- TfL said injury risk per journey remains lower than the 2010–14 baseline and cited a 27% drop in casualties per million cycle journeys since that period
- Critics argue the 2010–14 baseline is flawed because road casualties were particularly high during those years
- Cycling experts suspect the surge in injuries is more linked to London running out of cycling infrastructure capacity than to e-bike use
- TfL reported the strategic cycle network grew from 90km in 2016 to over 441km in 2025, with 17 new cycleway routes launched in 2024/25
- Conservative London Assembly member Thomas Turrell accused the Mayor and TfL of painting “a false image” that cycling is getting safer “when the opposite is true”
- Liberal Democrat London spokesman Luke Taylor said more analysis is needed to understand the role of “lack of further safe cycling infrastructure” and “illegally overpowered e-bikes”
- Green Group Leader Caroline Russell emphasised that “too many people are still suffering life-changing consequences as a result of road collisions”
Hackney (East London Times) June 11, 2026 – Hackney has emerged as one of London’s worst cycling accident hotspots after a new analysis revealed serious cycling injuries jumped from 42 in 2024 to 71 in 2025, including one fatality, according to the Evening Standard. The surge in Hackney reflects a broader trend across the capital, where the number of cyclists killed or seriously injured (KSIs) rose 20.3% from 994 to 1,196 — the highest level recorded since at least 2017.
- Key Points
- Is Cycling Becoming More Dangerous in London Despite Fewer Fatalities?
- How Do Overall Cycling Casualties Compare to Journey Growth?
- Why Are Campaigners Accusing TfL of a Data “Cover-Up”?
- What Is Driving the Rise in Serious Cycling Injuries?
- What Is TfL Saying About the Data and Future Safety Measures?
- Background: How Cycling Infrastructure and Safety Policy Have Evolved in London
- Prediction: How This Development Will Affect Cyclists, Commuters and East London Residents
The data, released as part of Transport for London’s latest road traffic safety figures, shows significant rises in multiple boroughs. Westminster recorded the highest absolute number of KSIs, increasing from 80 to 101, while Lambeth saw fatalities and serious injuries climb from 70 to 85.
In East London, Newham experienced a dramatic rise from 14 to 36 KSIs, and Hounslow increased from 26 to 45. The City of London rose from 22 to 35, Camden from 34 to 44, Lewisham from 34 to 44, and Bromley from 9 to 21.
Is Cycling Becoming More Dangerous in London Despite Fewer Fatalities?
Although TfL highlighted a drop in cycling fatalities from nine in 2024 to six in 2025 — the second lowest annual number of deaths — the organisation did not emphasise the 20% rise in KSIs, sparking accusations of a “cover-up”.
As reported by Ross Lydall of the Evening Standard, the transport chiefs instead focused on the fall in fatalities rather than the significant rise in serious and slight injuries involving bikes.
Transport campaigner John Stewart told the Evening Standard:
“The latest data suggests it’s becoming more dangerous to cycle on London’s streets. It’s no surprise that TfL tried to cover up these shocking figures”.
Simon Munk, head of campaigns at the London Cycling Campaign, added:
“The good news is that cycling levels are booming and fatalities are down. But the current level of risk is on the rise and there are more serious injuries than there was growth in cycling. That’s absolutely the wrong direction and highlights the need to do a lot more for cycling and walking”.
How Do Overall Cycling Casualties Compare to Journey Growth?
When slight injuries are included, total cycling casualties reached 5,662 in 2025, up 16.1% from 4,878 in 2024 — also a record high since at least 2017. Daily cycle journeys grew 12.7% from 1.33 million in 2024 to 1.5 million in 2025, meaning the rate of increase in injuries outpaced the growth in cycling.
As reported by Ross Lydall, this discrepancy suggests cycling in the capital has become more dangerous overall.
TfL’s release mentioned an eight per cent increase in serious injuries, rising from 3,597 to 3,900, “driven by both injuries” to people cycling and travelling in a car.
The transport body stated that while injury risk per journey has increased compared to 2024, it remains lower than the historical baseline.
Why Are Campaigners Accusing TfL of a Data “Cover-Up”?
The row centres on TfL’s May 29 road safety release, titled
“London road deaths down again in 2025, but more work to do to reduce road danger”.
TfL cited a 27 per cent reduction in casualties per million cycle journeys between the 2010–14 baseline and 2025, from 14.3 to 10.4 injuries per million journeys.
However, transport campaigners criticised the use of 2010–14 as a baseline, stressing that road casualties were particularly high during this period. As reported by the Evening Standard, Conservative London Assembly member Thomas Turrell said:
“Londoners will have serious questions about the objectivity and reliability of the data the Mayor and TfL presents them now that we understand how they present it. It strikes at the heart of transparency in government when authorities seek to paint a false image — that cycling in the capital is getting safer — when the opposite is true”.
Road safety activist Vincent Stops, who has highlighted the growing number of casualties, stressed:
“The number of cycling KSIs on London’s roads is at a record high. By failing to point this out, they (TfL) are not being honest and sufficiently open and so policy making will be poor”.
What Is Driving the Rise in Serious Cycling Injuries?
Cycling experts suspect the growing number of injuries is more linked to London running out of cycling infrastructure capacity rather than the greater use of e-bikes, although TfL noted the
“widespread adoption of e-bikes, both dockless rental bikes and privately owned bikes”.
Liberal Democrat London spokesman Luke Taylor said:
“It is encouraging to see the number of cyclists being killed by drivers on London’s roads drop to the lowest level since 2020, even as cycling levels continue to rise. It is alarming however to see the rates of injuries increase, and more analysis is needed to understand how much of this increase is due to lack of further safe cycling infrastructure being delivered, or the impact of illegally overpowered e-bikes on our roads”.
Caroline Russell, Leader of the Green Group on the London Assembly, added:
“While fewer people are losing their lives on London’s roads, the rise in serious injuries is a reminder that too many people are still suffering life-changing consequences as a result of road collisions”.
What Is TfL Saying About the Data and Future Safety Measures?
A TfL spokesperson said:
“We’re determined to eliminate deaths and serious injuries on London’s roads and we’re committed to being open and transparent with all of our safety related data. That’s why we’ve made this easily accessible to the public through our Road Danger Reduction Dashboard”.
The transport body stressed its commitment to making cycling “sustainable, safe and accessible for all” and noted the strategic cycle network had been increased from 90km in 2016 to over 441km in 2025, a seven per cent increase from 2024, with 17 new cycleway routes launched in 2024/25.
TfL emphasised that the six cycling fatalities in 2025 were the second lowest annual number of deaths and stated:
“But overall cycling casualties are 27.6 per cent lower per million cycle journeys than our 2010–14 baseline, which demonstrates the progress made in making streets safer”.
Background: How Cycling Infrastructure and Safety Policy Have Evolved in London
London has seen large growth in cycle lanes and other infrastructure over the past decade, with the Mayor aiming to make London the world’s best big city for cycling. Travel in London 2023 data showed daily cycle journeys hit an estimated 1.26 million per day, equivalent to about a third of daily Tube network journeys. Between 2000 and 2022, London achieved a 43 per cent reduction in casualties per million cycle journeys.
However, 2025 marks a reversal in some safety metrics, with KSIs reaching a record high since at least 2017 despite continued growth in cycling.
The TfL Road Danger Reduction Dashboard now provides public access to detailed safety data, though campaigners argue the presentation of figures has lacked transparency regarding the rise in serious injuries.
The debate over e-bikes and infrastructure capacity has intensified, with officials acknowledging widespread e-bike adoption while experts suspect infrastructure limitations are the primary driver of rising injuries. Seventeen new cycleway routes were launched in 2024/25 as part of ongoing efforts to expand the strategic network.
Prediction: How This Development Will Affect Cyclists, Commuters and East London Residents
The surge in serious cycling injuries across Hackney, Newham, Hounslow and other boroughs will likely affect daily cyclists, commuters and East London residents in several concrete ways. Cyclists in East London — particularly those using Hackney and Newham, where KSIs rose sharply — may face increased perceived risk, potentially reducing willingness to cycle for work or leisure unless safer infrastructure is delivered quickly.
Commuters who rely on cycling as a cost-effective transport option may encounter heightened anxiety about road safety, especially on routes lacking dedicated bike lanes.
A report disclosed in November 2025 found only 40% of cyclists using roads without dedicated lanes felt secure, compared to 76% on marked cycling paths. This disparity suggests that without expanded protected infrastructure, injury rates may continue to outpace journey growth.
East London residents living near high-traffic cycling corridors could experience more frequent collisions involving cyclists and pedestrians, particularly as total cycling casualties reached 5,662 in 2025.
At least 335 pedestrians were injured in collisions with cyclists in London in 2024, with 99 serious injuries, indicating that rising cycling volumes also increase risks for non-cyclists.
Local councils in boroughs with the largest rises — such as Hackney, Newham, Westminster and Lambeth — may face pressure to accelerate infrastructure upgrades, enforce e-bike regulations, and improve road design to prevent life-changing injuries.
If TfL and the Mayor do not address the infrastructure capacity gap, public trust in safety data could erode further, as warned by Thomas Turrell and Vincent Stops.
