Redbridge Keeps Tax Cuts for Benefit Residents Amid Crisis

News Desk
Redbridge Keeps Tax Cuts for Benefit Residents Amid Crisis
Credit: Google Street View/ภาพของSakorn Sukkasemsakorn

Key Points

  • Redbridge Council will maintain its council tax reduction scheme despite financial pressures, supporting over 14,000 households.
  • Working-age households with disability benefits like PIP receive the highest support at 73 per cent reduction.
  • Families and adults not in work on Universal Credit or other benefits pay 40 to 50 per cent of their bill, varying by presence of children.
  • Other low-income households get 36 to 46 per cent discounts, with more support for families than childless households.
  • The scheme cost the council around £18 million last year amid a significant overspend.
  • Currently, 14,243 families benefit: 9,101 working-age households and 5,142 pensioners.
  • Executive Director of Resources David Kuenssberg stated the council’s commitment to reducing poverty.
  • Aims include eradicating child poverty by 2040 and fostering financial resilience through work support.
  • Council faces £27 million overspend this year, mainly from social care, homelessness, housing (£23.5 million), and people directorate (£28.2 million).
  • Council Leader Kam Rai praised a £63 million funding increase over three years.

Redbridge (Yellow Advertiser) January 16, 2026 – Redbridge Council has confirmed it will retain its council tax reduction scheme for residents on benefits, even as the authority grapples with severe financial strain. More than 14,000 households currently receive bill discounts based on eligibility criteria, providing vital relief amid rising costs. The decision underscores the council’s priority on poverty alleviation despite a projected £27 million overspend this financial year.​

Why is Redbridge Council Keeping the Tax Reduction Scheme?

Redbridge Council explicitly states it will not alter the financial support offered to residents struggling with council tax payments. As detailed in coverage by the Yellow Advertiser, more than 14,000 households qualify for reductions under specific criteria. Working-age households where someone receives disability benefits such as Personal Independence Payment (PIP) secure the highest level of aid, with a 73 per cent reduction on their bills.

Families and adults not in employment who claim Universal Credit or other benefits face bills at 40 to 50 per cent of the full amount, depending on whether children are present in the household. Other low-income households benefit from discounts between 36 and 46 per cent, with families receiving greater support than those without dependants. These measures, while generous, resulted in the council forgoing approximately £18 million in revenue last year.​

A report published this week highlights that 14,243 families currently rely on the scheme, comprising 9,101 working-age households and 5,142 pensioners. The council, described as cash-strapped due to ongoing overspends, views this as essential support for vulnerable groups.

What Did Council Officials Say About Poverty Reduction?

Executive Director of Resources David Kuenssberg emphasised the council’s dedication in a statement reported by the Yellow Advertiser.

“The council is committed to reducing poverty and will continue its tackling poverty initiatives to ensure it helps those residents most in need of support,”

Kuenssberg said.

The town hall has set ambitious targets, including eradicating child poverty by 2040. It plans to achieve this by helping residents build financial resilience and, where suitable, supporting them into employment or higher-paid roles. These initiatives form part of broader efforts to transition families from dependency to self-sufficiency.​

How Severe is Redbridge Council’s Financial Crisis?

Despite these commitments, Redbridge Council confronts a dire fiscal landscape. Projections released in November forecast a £27 million overspend for this financial year, which officers labelled a “gravely concerning” development. This shortfall mirrors challenges faced by councils across London, primarily driven by escalating costs in key areas.

The ‘place’ directorate, responsible for housing, reports a £23.5 million overspend, while the ‘people’ directorate—overseeing public health, social care, and education—faces £28.2 million in excess expenditure. Social care and homelessness pressures once again dominate, as noted in the council’s financial updates. These factors have strained resources, prompting scrutiny of all spending areas.​

What Funding Changes Has the Council Welcomed?

Council Leader Kam Rai expressed approval for recent government support, as covered in the Yellow Advertiser. Rai praised the latest funding settlement, which delivers an increase of £63 million over the next three years. He contrasted this positively with the previous funding model, stating it “did not work” for local authorities like Redbridge.

This influx aims to stabilise operations amid persistent demands. However, officers stress the need to balance anti-poverty goals against budgetary realities. The council must navigate these tensions while upholding services for residents.​

Who Qualifies for the Highest Council Tax Discounts?

Eligibility hinges on benefit receipt and household composition, per the scheme’s structure outlined by the Yellow Advertiser. Working-age households with PIP or similar disability benefits claim the maximum 73 per cent cut, targeting those with severe needs. This tier acknowledges the extra costs associated with disabilities.

Universal Credit claimants not in work follow, with reductions scaled by family status: 50 per cent for those with children, 40 per cent otherwise. Low-income working households receive 36 to 46 per cent off, prioritising families. Pensioners form a significant portion, with 5,142 benefiting alongside working-age groups.​

How Does the Scheme Impact Council Finances?

The reductions equate to a substantial revenue loss, approximately £18 million in the past year alone. This figure compounds the council’s woes, already burdened by directorate overspends. Yet, decision-makers prioritise continuity, viewing cuts to the scheme as counterproductive to poverty goals.

The 14,243 supported households represent a broad cross-section, from disabled individuals to unemployed families. Maintaining the programme aligns with statutory duties and local mandates, even as financial projections worsen.​

What Broader Challenges Face London Councils Like Redbridge?

Redbridge’s predicament echoes wider trends across the capital. Social care demands, homelessness surges, and housing costs persistently outpace funding, as officers repeatedly highlight. The £27 million gap this year stems “once again” from these pressures, per internal reports.

London boroughs share similar narratives, with adult and children’s services devouring budgets. Redbridge’s £28.2 million people directorate deficit and £23.5 million place shortfall exemplify the strain. National funding tweaks offer partial relief, but systemic reforms remain urgent.​

What Are the Long-Term Poverty Eradication Plans?

Beyond immediate relief, Redbridge eyes systemic change. The 2040 child poverty elimination pledge drives policy, linking tax relief to employment pathways. Financial resilience programmes target progression into work or better wages, reducing long-term reliance.

David Kuenssberg’s comments reinforce this strategy, framing support as a bridge to independence. The council integrates these with tackling poverty initiatives, ensuring aid reaches the neediest. Success hinges on balancing ambition with fiscal discipline.​

How Does Government Funding Affect Future Decisions?

Kam Rai’s endorsement of the £63 million settlement signals cautious optimism. Spread over three years, it bolsters core services without mandating scheme alterations. Rai critiqued prior models, implying the new approach better equips councils for demand.

Yet, projections underscore ongoing risks. Officers urge vigilance, as overspends threaten reserves. The funding aids stability but does not erase underlying cost pressures from care and housing.

Follow:
Independent voice of East London, delivering timely news, local insights, politics, business, and community stories with accuracy and impact.