Key Points
- Havering has recorded approximately 2,200 shoplifting offences over the latest 12‑month period, giving the borough a shoplifting rate of 7.6 offences per 1,000 residents.
- Despite the rise in retail theft, Havering remains one of London’s safer boroughs overall, with total crime levels around 17% lower than the London average.
- Police say targeted operations and stronger neighbourhood policing are beginning to reduce shoplifting in some of the borough’s hardest‑hit areas.
- A major “Clear Hold Build” partnership operation between Havering Council and the Metropolitan Police in Harold Hill has led to more than 130 arrests and a fall of over 41% in local shoplifting offences.
- The scheme focuses on neighbourhood policing, targeted patrols and intelligence‑led action against prolific repeat offenders.
- Criminal Behaviour Orders have been secured against persistent offenders in areas such as Elm Park, banning individuals from multiple shopping locations after repeated thefts.
- Retail staff nationally are increasingly facing abuse, threats and violence while trying to prevent theft, with national figures highlighting thousands of incidents.
- Many local businesses in Romford, Hornchurch and Elm Park have responded by boosting CCTV, hiring extra security staff and locking away high‑value items.
- Police and council officials emphasise that public intelligence from residents and shopkeepers is “crucial” in identifying repeat offenders more quickly.
- Officers insist continued enforcement, visible policing, faster action against prolific offenders and stronger support for retailers form the long‑term strategy for tackling shoplifting in Havering.
Havering, (East London Times) May 15, 2026 Havering police and council officials have laid bare the scale of a deep‑rooted retail‑theft problem after a 12‑month tally revealed around 2,200 shoplifting offences across the borough, equating to roughly 7.6 offences per 1,000 residents. This figure underlines how shoplifting has become one of the most visible and daily‑faced issues for both residents and retailers, even as the borough’s overall crime rate remains about 17% lower than the London average.
- Key Points
- Where are the hotspots and who is being targeted?
- What are the profiles of offenders and how are officers responding?
- What are Criminal Behaviour Orders doing to curb repeat offenders?
- How are retailers protecting staff and stock in Romford, Hornchurch and Elm Park?
- What role is public intelligence playing in Havering’s shoplifting crackdown?
- Background of the development
- Prediction: How could this development affect Havering residents and retailers?
Where are the hotspots and who is being targeted?
Retailers in Romford, Hornchurch, Elm Park and Harold Hill report a steady increase in thefts, with many telling outlets that the true impact is likely worse than official statistics show because smaller thefts often go unreported.
As noted by local business leaders, staff are not only dealing with casual petty theft but also with aggressive confrontations, while some witnesses have described youths openly taking items from shelves without fear of immediate consequences.
What are the profiles of offenders and how are officers responding?
Police across Havering say they are increasingly dealing with three overlapping groups: prolific individual offenders, organised retail‑crime gangs and young people who appear to view shoplifting as a low‑risk activity.
Officers have described cases where repeat thieves have been seen cycling from one store to another, deliberately targeting outlets with perceived weak security or limited CCTV coverage.
Despite these challenges, senior officers argue that a shift toward more visible, intelligence‑led policing is already producing measurable results. In Harold Hill, a joint “Clear Hold Build” initiative between Havering Council and the Metropolitan Police has led to more than 130 arrests over the operation period and a reduction of over 41% in shoplifting offences in that specific area.
As reported by council sources, the plan combines extra foot patrols, targeted vehicle checkpoints and sustained engagement with communities to disrupt known hotspots without resorting to blanket, punitive measures across the wider borough.
What are Criminal Behaviour Orders doing to curb repeat offenders?
In parallel with the “Clear Hold Build” efforts, local magistrates have granted Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs) against several persistent offenders operating around Elm Park and surrounding shopping streets.
A CBO is a civil‑style order that can, for example, bar an individual from entering specific premises or using certain areas during set hours; breach of the order can lead to immediate arrest and potential custodial sentences.
As relayed by court‑source briefings, one prolific offender was recently banned from multiple shopping areas in the borough after being convicted of repeated theft offences.
The conditions of the order were tailored to the patterns of offending, including restrictions around major supermarkets and high‑street chains that had repeatedly reported thefts linked to that individual. Police say such orders are one of the few tools available that allow them to act quickly when someone is caught committing multiple thefts but is not yet facing a lengthy prison sentence.
How are retailers protecting staff and stock in Romford, Hornchurch and Elm Park?
Retail leaders in Romford, Hornchurch and Elm Park have made clear that they feel forced to adapt to an environment where thefts are frequent and sometimes accompanied by abuse or threats.
National retail figures, cited by several UK‑wide trade bodies, show that thousands of shop staff across the country face verbal abuse, threats or physical violence each year while trying to challenge suspected shoplifters or prevent theft.
Local supermarket managers and convenience‑store owners around Havering have told outlets that they have been forced to install additional CCTV cameras, lock up high‑value items such as electronics and cosmetics, and in some cases hire extra security staff or use private security firms. One Romford store manager, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that
“staff are supposed to feel safe doing their job, not nervous about being sworn at or pushed when they ask someone to stop taking items.”
What role is public intelligence playing in Havering’s shoplifting crackdown?
Police in Havering have repeatedly urged residents and shopkeepers to report incidents and share intelligence about suspicious behaviour, arguing that many repeat offenders can be identified only when multiple sightings are collated over time.
Neighbourhood‑policing teams have reported that calls and online reports from members of the public have helped officers build dossiers on individuals who may be responsible for scores of small thefts across different stores.
As conveyed by a senior Met Police officer based in the borough,
“intelligence from the community is absolutely crucial… it helps us to understand patterns, link incidents and move quickly against prolific offenders instead of reacting to each theft as if it’s isolated.”
Some local councils have also encouraged businesses to join or expand anti‑crime forums, where store owners and managers can share surveillance footage and patterns of suspicious behaviour with police and one another under agreed confidentiality rules.
Background of the development
The current push in Havering forms part of a broader trend across London and the UK, where shoplifting has risen in the wake of the pandemic, changing shopping habits and, in some cases, reduced staffing and security budgets in retail.
Over the past few years, several boroughs have reported similar spikes in petty theft, often linked to a small number of repeat offenders who exploit the sheer volume of retail outlets and the limited capacity of police and courts to respond to each individual case.
Havering has previously positioned itself as a relatively low‑crime borough within London, but local authorities have acknowledged that the visibility of shoplifting in high‑street areas damages both the perception of safety and the viability of independent retailers.
The “Clear Hold Build” partnership model tested in Harold Hill adapts a type of policing strategy originally developed in other parts of the capital, where tight collaboration between councils, police and community groups has been used to reduce street‑level disorder and retail crime in defined zones.
Prediction: How could this development affect Havering residents and retailers?
If the current approach in Havering is maintained and expanded, the most immediate benefit for residents is likely to be a noticeable reduction in open thefts and associated anti‑social behaviour in the borough’s busiest shopping areas.
A sustained drop in shoplifting offences could make streets and centres such as Romford Market, Romford town centre, Hornchurch High Street and Harold Hill parade feel safer for shoppers, particularly vulnerable groups such as older adults and parents with young children.
For local retailers, any genuine and sustained reduction in thefts could ease some of the financial pressure caused by shrinkage, allow stores to reduce reliance on locked‑cabinet displays and, potentially, help keep prices and staffing levels more stable. However, shopworkers may still face risks as long as some offenders continue to act aggressively, so the effectiveness of the strategy will depend on whether police can maintain visible patrols, secure fast‑tracked prosecutions for repeat thieves and ensure that courts are willing to impose meaningful sanctions, including Behaviour Orders and custodial sentences where appropriate.
