Key Points
- Greater London Authority (GLA) faces a projected £19.2 million budget gap unlikely to be filled.
- Additional potential £2.2 million budget hit if West Ham United is relegated from the Premier League.
- GLA awaiting clarity on business rates, local government reform, and Integrated Settlement.
- Budget uncertainties described as “unprecedented” by GLA officials.
- Mayor’s Chief of Staff David Bellamy criticises the “badly written” stadium deal signed by former Mayor Boris Johnson.
- The London Stadium lease deal lacks a break clause and causes financial losses for the GLA.
- City Hall Conservatives highlight disappointment in the Labour Government’s impact on London finances.
- Labour Assembly Member Bassam Mahfouz calls the deal a “financial fiasco” and the worst Premier League deal in history.
Why is the GLA facing a budget gap of £19.2 million?
As reported by Kumail Jaffer of the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the Greater London Authority (GLA) is currently grappling with an “unavoidable” revenue shortfall of £19.2 million. Mary Harpley, Chief Officer at the GLA, explained to the London Assembly that this deficit remains despite drawing £4.7 million from reserves. The gap largely arises from strategic decisions, including mitigating the loss of UK Shared Prosperity Funding, which provided nearly £63 million to London in 2025-26, now ending next year.
- Key Points
- Why is the GLA facing a budget gap of £19.2 million?
- What uncertainties complicate the budget situation?
- How does West Ham United’s potential relegation affect GLA finances?
- What criticism has been made about the stadium deal?
- What political reactions have surfaced regarding the GLA’s budget and funding?
- When will the GLA finalise the budget?
Officials also outlined £9 million in necessary budget “realignments,” including an increase for the London Resilience Unit and costs linked to relocating GLA staff to new offices in Southwark, as the lease at London Fire Brigade headquarters expires. The combination of these factors compounds the current financial challenge.
What uncertainties complicate the budget situation?
At the Budget and Performance Committee meeting on 18 November, senior GLA officers acknowledged an “unprecedented level of uncertainty” blocking the production of proposals to bridge the funding gap. Ms Harpley noted the GLA is still awaiting formal announcements on business rates, local government reform, and the proposed Integrated Settlement for London.
She was clear that the gap’s resolution is unlikely:
“Not at the moment – this is the gap generated by this draft budget with this level of uncertainty. We have to see where all of that uncertainty lands.”
David Bellamy, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff, stressed the additional complexity caused by the Government’s ongoing major review of local government funding. He indicated the provisional settlement is expected ahead of Parliament’s Christmas recess on 18 December, after which the GLA can present a draft group budget in mid-January followed by the final version in February.
Bellamy emphasised that the gap cannot simply be blamed on the current Labour Government, saying,
“Anything is possible… We’ve assumed council tax and business rates will continue in the way they have,”
but many funding aspects remain under review.
How does West Ham United’s potential relegation affect GLA finances?
The financial outlook for the GLA could deteriorate if West Ham United is relegated from the Premier League, according to Bob Gamble, reporting for the Daily Mirror. The East London football club currently pays £4.4 million annually to rent the London Stadium, owned by the GLA. However, Bellamy warned this amount could fall by half if West Ham drops to the Championship.
The GLA has sustained losses running the stadium: last year’s budget allocated £19.5 million for stadium costs, and the draft 2026-27 budget sets aside £12 million. Bellamy criticised the deal overseeing the stadium, describing it as “badly written” and without any break clause, signed under former Mayor Boris Johnson.
He said,
“The previous Mayor negotiated and signed a contract that is a bad financial deal for Londoners,”
but added that the stadium remains a valuable asset they want to maximise. Bellamy noted recent West Ham wins with cautious optimism:
“I’m very pleased they have won a couple of games recently. Long may that continue.”
What criticism has been made about the stadium deal?
Bassam Mahfouz, Labour Assembly Member for London, speaking to the LDRS, condemned the stadium deal as “the worst football deal in Premier League history,” signed off by former Mayor Boris Johnson. Mahfouz highlighted the financial burden on Londoners and the potential additional £2.5 million cost annually if West Ham is relegated.
He said,
“Londoners across the capital might end up cheering on West Ham once they discover they’ll be paying an extra £2.5 million a year if the club is relegated. It’s a financial fiasco so badly negotiated it could only be described as an own goal.”
What political reactions have surfaced regarding the GLA’s budget and funding?
Neil Garratt, finance spokesman for City Hall Conservatives, told the LDRS,
“By their own admission, this is the toughest and most uncertain budget position the GLA has ever been in at this stage.”
He criticized the Labour Government for failing to support London financially despite promises made during the last election.
Garratt reflected disappointment that London has not benefited as expected:
“The Mayor’s officials put a brave face on it, but the Mayor must feel badly let down by the Labour Government he spent so long calling for.”
When will the GLA finalise the budget?
The GLA expects to receive the Government’s provisional settlement before MPs leave for the Christmas recess on 18 December. After this, final budget numbers will be calculated, with a draft group budget planned for presentation on 15 January. The final budget is scheduled for approval in February 2026.
David Bellamy emphasised the need for a holistic view, acknowledging the current pause in budget adjustments occurs due to widespread governmental reviews affecting funding streams that have remained unsettled over the past five years.
